Друкеровский вестник

Drukerovskij vestnik

ISSN 2312-6469 (Print)


Drukerovskij vestnik 2016; 5:

 

http://dx.doi.org/10.17213/2312-6469-2016-5-22-33

 

THE DIFFUSION OF NEW KNOWLEDGE: SPILLOVER OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN THE BUSINESS SECTOR

O.G. Golichenko, A.Y. Lukovkin

Golichenko Oleg G. – Doctor of Economics, Head Researcher in the Central Economics and Mathematics Institute RAS, Moscow, Russia

47 Nahimovskiy ln., 117418, Moscow, Russia

Lukovkin Aleksey Yu. – student in the Moscow Physical-Technical Institute, Moscow, Russia.

47 Nahimovskiy ln., 117418, Moscow, Russia

тел. 8-985- 893-3549, email: lukovkin@phystech.edu 

 

Abstract

The article provides a critical analysis of existing knowledge-based economics approaches with respect to their application to modeling diffusion (spillover) of results of research and development (R&D) in a business environment. The analysis let us define the approach that most adequately takes into account the peculiarities of the spillover. It is shown that Qian and Acs' model formed on the basis of this approach does not take into consideration all the relevant factors of the spillover process. At the same time, the empirical test of the model has several shortages. In order to improve the model, some of its assumptions are refined, and the additional factor that has a significant influence on emerging new technology firms is introduced. Particularly, some methods for measuring variables of the model are corrected. The test of the revised model was carried out. The result of the test gives an empirical evidence of the main statements of the prevailing theory of the R&D spillover in the business environment.

 

Keywords: knowledge production function, new knowledge, new firm, absorptive capacity.

 

Full text: [in elibrary.ru]

 

References

  1. Acs Z.J., Anselin L., Varga A. Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge // Research Policy. 2002. Vol. 31, No 7). Pp. 1069–1085.
  2. Acs Z.J., Audretsch D.B. Innovation, market structure, and firm size // Review of Economics and Statistics. 1987. Vol. 69, No 4. Pp. 567–574.
  3. Acs Z.J., Audretsch D.B. Innovation in large and small firms: An empirical analysis // American Economic Review. 1988. Vol. 78, No 4. Pp. 678–690.
  4. Acs Z.J., Audretsch D.B., Braunerhjelm P., Carlsson B. The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship // Small Business Economics. 2009. Vol. 32. Pp. 15–30.
  5. Acs Z.J., Armington C. Entrepreneurship, geography, and American economic growth, 2006. New York: Cambridge University Press. 262 p.
  6. Audretsch D.B., Keilbach M.C. Entrepreneurship, economic growth and restructuring. In M. Casson, B. Yeung, A. Basu, N. Wadeson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of entrepreneurship, 2006. New York: Oxford University Press. Pp. 185-197.
  7. Anselin L., Varga A., Acs Z. Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations // Journal of Urban Economics. 1997. Vol. 42, No 3. Pp. 422–448.
  8. Anselin L., Varga A., Acs Z. Geographic and sectoral characteristics of academic knowledge externalities // Papers in Regional Science. 2000. Vol. 79. Pp. 435–443.
  9. Arrow K.J. The economic implications of learning by doing // Review of Economic Studies. 1962. Vol. 29, No 3. Pp. 155–173.
  10. Braunerhjelm P., Acs Z.J., Audretsch D.B., Carlsson B. The missing link: Knowledge diffusion and entrepreneurship in endogenous growth // Small Business Economics. 2010. Vol. 34, No 2. Pp. 105–125.
  11. Griliches Z. Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth // Bell Journal of Economics. 1979. Vol. 10, No 1. Pp. 92–116.
  12. Jaffe A.B. Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms’ patents, profits, and market value // American Economic Review. 1986. Vol. 76, No 5. Pp. 984–1001.
  13. Jaffe A.B. Real effects of academic research // American Economic Review. 1989. Vol. 79, No 5. Pp. 957–970.
  14. Jaffe A.B., Trajtenberg M., Henderson R. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations // The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1993. Vol. 108, No 3. Pp. 577–598.
  15. Michelacci C. Low returns in R&D due to the lack of entrepreneurial skills // The Economic Journal. 2002. Vol. 113. Pp. 207–225.
  16. Peri G. Determinants of knowledge flows and their effect on innovation // Review of Economics and Statistics. 2005. Vol. 87, No 2. Pp. 308–322.
  17. Romer P.M. Endogenous technological change // Journal of Political Economy. 1990. Vol. 98, No 5. Pp. S71–S102.
  18. Qian H., Acs Z.J. An absorptive capacity theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship // Small Business Economy. 2013. Vol. 40. Pp. 185–197.